![]() The debate held in the lower house (the Lok Sabha, or People’s Assembly) on Apeven saw the emergence of " a rare consensus in a country where the polity is sharply divided on most issues". This stance, which is not a trivial one, was not met with any objection in the Indian parliament. It is well known that the Indian government refused to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and that it has repeatedly abstained in UN meetings including the Security Council, where it is present as a non-permanent member until next December. Above all, it reflects a widespread view in New Delhi that India now occupies a central position on the political world stage and that it is a balancing power, able to relate equally with all parties to the conflict. The dominant consensus can be explained in many ways. This reality inhibits debate, even if important nuances in point of view do exist. Second, a certain consensus has quickly emerged regarding the Ukraine crisis. Not only are ‘international’ sections of Indian newspapers few and far between, but they also focus their attention on India’s neighborhood. First, only a very small number of actors are interested in the topic. Two observations can be made regarding the debates about the war in Ukraine taking place in India’s public domain. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |